The Remarkable Fools Letter

The Remarkable Fools Letter

Share this post

The Remarkable Fools Letter
The Remarkable Fools Letter
On the question of 'triggers'
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

On the question of 'triggers'

Everyday, ordinary fools seem to confuse themselves with guns.

Jim Dalling's avatar
Jim Dalling
Feb 21, 2022
∙ Paid
3

Share this post

The Remarkable Fools Letter
The Remarkable Fools Letter
On the question of 'triggers'
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
Share

When I was twelve years old I was given a shotgun for Christmas.

It is a single shot twenty gauge Winchester.

When I pull the trigger, the response is almost instantaneous.

When I pull the trigger, there’s no going back.

There is very loud sound.

There are smells.

There is smoke.

The gun explodes backward into my shoulder.

The shot blasts out of the muzzle.

It is a brief, dangerous and violent process.

When people discuss emotional triggers, it makes me think about how actual triggers work in reality. I do not think that trigger is a very good term.

Let’s start with the etymology of ‘trigger’

trigger (n.)

"device by means of which a catch or spring is released and a mechanism set in action," 1650s, earlier tricker (1620s), from Dutch trekker "trigger," from trekken "to pull" (see trek). Tricker was the usual form in English until c. 1750. Trigger-finger "forefinger as used to pull the trigger of a gun" is attested by 1814. Trigger-happy "ready to shoot (or otherwise react violently) on the s…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The Remarkable Fools Letter to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 James Dalling
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More